Index
|
Search
|
Home
|
Table of Contents
Lawrence, B.M. 1993. A planning scheme to evaluate new aromatic plants for
the flavor and fragrance industries. p. 620-627. In: J. Janick and J.E. Simon
(eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York.
A Planning Scheme to Evaluate New Aromatic Plants for the Flavor and Fragrance Industries
Brian M. Lawrence
- NEW CROP SELECTION
- STAGE 1: SCREENING OF PLANTS IN SMALL PLOTS
- STAGE 2: EVALUATION OF TRIAL ROWS
- STAGE 3: SMALL SCALE EXPERIMENTAL ACREAGE
- STAGE 4: MINI-COMMERCIALIZATION
- STAGE 5: FULL COMMERCIALIZATION
- REFERENCES
- Table 1
- Table 2
- Table 3
- Table 4
- Table 5
- Table 6
- Table 7
There are approximately 300 natural products used as raw materials in the
flavor and fragrance industry. These raw materials can be found in the form of
essential oils, extracts, oleoresins, concretes, absolutes, resinoids, and
tinctures to name the major groups. Of these materials, about half are
produced from cultivated plants while the remaining 50% are obtained either as
by-products of a primary industry or are harvested from natural wild plants.
Raw materials such as galbanum or opopanax are not distilled or extracted
within close proximity where grown so these will not enter this discussion as
they have little relevance as new crops.
The major portion of this discussion will be directed towards essential oil
bearing plants. The 20 major oils in the world market are presented in Table 1. Accurate production figures are available for those oils produced in the
United States (Simon 1990), but production statistics from third world
countries and even some western countries are more obscure. Previous surveys
of essential oils include those of Lawrence 1985 and the ITC (Anon 1986). The
large volumes of oil produced suggest an economic potential for essential oil
bearing plants as new crops.
The traditional view of essential oil production is that of simple farming or
collection followed by oil distillation or extraction. Both intrinsic factors
(genotype, state of maturity, part of plant harvested) and extrinsic factors
(light, temperature, water, nutrients) will strongly influence the oil yield
and composition (Bernath 1986; Lawrence 1986). Within a single clone, the
intrinsic factors can be fixed whereas the extrinsic factors cannot.
In this paper, a crop development planning scheme is proposed which will be
directed specifically towards the commercialization of essential oil species in
the families Lamiaceae (Labiatae) (Table 2), Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) (Table 3),
and Asteraceae (Compositae) (Table 4).
Prior to any market survey or crop selection, a knowledge is required of the
micro-environment, the land, and water resources, natural flora and fauna, and
local agricultural skills and problems. These include annual record of the
maximum and minimum temperatures on a 24 hour basis, photoperiod, rainfall,
soil type, pH, nutrient and humus content, and water holding capacity.
It is useful to know what irrigation methods are used locally, what are the
local sources of water, and what is the normal frequency of irrigation and the
quantity of water applied for specific crops for what periods of time. What is
the normal field size? Is full mechanization feasible? What are the main
local agricultural problems? What are the local pest disease and weed
problems? What are the normal crops and cropping priorities. In the United
States, much of this information along with some of the environmental data is
readily available from the State Department of Agriculture or County
Cooperative Extension Service.
An economic survey of oil production must be compiled. A crop development
scheme for establishment and implementation of an essential oil crop
development program using eastern North Carolina as an example of a site will
be discussed. For essential oils a laboratory which possesses the capability
of running labscale distillations, physico-chemical parameter measurements, and
gas chromatographic analyses should be in place as well as a commercial scale
steam distillation facility. It must be remembered that essential oils, which
are natural mixtures of secondary plant products, are raw materials used in the
flavor and fragrance industries. As a result, there are some economic
questions that require accurate answers:
- Which oils are in short supply and which are in over supply?
- Are there any current use trends for individual oils?
- Which oils are subject to adulteration?
- What oils are subject to climatic or political problems?
To answer these questions with today's information, the main essential oils
which I have found to be in short supply are patchouli, hyssop, lemon balm,
sage (Lamiaceae), blue chamomile, tagetes, yarrow, (Asteraceae) and galbanum,
lovage herb, parsley herb (Apiaceae), whereas the oils in oversupply are spike
lavender (Lamiaceae) and fennel (Apiaceae). The only current use trend in the
oils of the three families other than those noted above is a decrease in
lavender oil. All oils that possess components for which synthetic
counterparts are readily available are subject to adulteration even if the
chirality of the synthetic adulterant does not match that of the natural
compound. Essential oils are produced in a variety of temperate and tropical
parts of the world. Any oils that can be produced in the Peoples Republic of
China can have a substantial impact of their supply and demand because they may
be sold on the world market or they may be stockpiled below production costs or
to elevate market price. I have seen this over the last decade with cornmint
and citronella oils. In the former Soviet Union, eastern Europe, and other
countries desperate for international currency, essential oils are often
bartered into the Western world. I believe that much of the coriander oil
produced in the former Soviet Union found its way into western countries via
the barter route.
Assuming the decision is made that the essential oil production facility can be
built and in this case study will be located in eastern North Carolina and the
appropriate information is available that will help make a selection of which
plants to grow, a set of action steps to become a commercial essential oil
producer is needed. Let me propose a 5-stage development plan as follows:
-
Stage 1: Screening plants in small plots
Stage 2: Evaluation of trial rows
Stage 3: Small scale experimental plantings
Stage 4: Mini-commercialization
Stage 5: Full-scale commercialization
- Questions that need to answered during this stage include:
- Will the plant grow well in this environment?
- Are there any climatic restrictions?
- Can the plant be reproduced successfully?
- Can the plant be rotated with other cash crops currently produced?
- What are potential problems?
- What are the projected economics?
The workload associated with this stage can be summarized as follows: prepare
experimental garden, acquire seeds/plants, propagate seedlings/cuttings, plant
garden, keep records, culture plants, study growth habits, maintain history on
individual plants, harvest plants, steam distill plants, record yield, and
conduct chemical analysis on promising oils. It is important to isolate plants
for seed production that cross pollinate, eliminate any that show signs of
disease, have insect pest problems, or that indicate mixed populations. Plants
of little potential should be removed. A dossier must be maintained on all
plants in the field.
At the same time as stage 1 screening is underway, economic dossiers on each
promising species should be prepared. An example of a dossier for caraway can
be seen in Table 5. Depending upon the species a plant may have to be grown in
stage 1 for more than one year as all pertinent information may not be
obtained. Assuming a species has potential, it is most likely that the best
genotype has not been grown. A range of oil yields that were obtained from
various cultivars of some selected species grown over a 2-year period is
presented in Table 6. These results clearly demonstrate that selection of a
specific strain or chemotype with the highest oil yield (assuming an acceptable
chemical composition) is imperative to maximize an economic return.
Before proceeding from stage 1 to stage 2, positive answers to the following
questions are needed.
- Will the plant grow well in this environment?
- Does the oil yield appear promising?
- Does the oil composition indicate potential market acceptability?
- Is there a potential market for the oil?
- Is the oil a new geographic source for an existing oil?
- Is the oil a currently unknown commodity?
- Is the oil a source of a potentially marketable aroma chemical?
- Is there a uniqueness in the oil?
- Is the chemical composition of the oil normal?
- Is the oil subject to synthetic replacement?
- Is the oil vulnerable to speculation?
- Is there any American competition for the oil?
- What is the market size for the oil?
- What are the origin distributions of competitive oils versus markets?
The following questions need to be answered in this trial row stage:
- What is optimum method of reproduction?
- Does planting date affect plant growth?
- What is optimum spacing in and between plants?
- What is the projected oil yield per unit acre?
- What is the best method for reproduction?
- At what maturity stage is the highest quantity of good quality oil
produced?
- What is the diurnal fluctuation in oil yield?
The workload associated with this stage in the development plan can be
summarized as follows: prepare the land, plan layout for trial rows, propagate
plants, plant trial rows, determine alternate propagation methods, and keep
records. For selected species, plant at various dates and spacings, determine
good crop culture, monitor effect of stress on plants, and examine plants
closely for problems. Finally, harvest plants at distinct stages of maturity
and determine oil yield. Determine oil composition of oils obtained from
plants harvested at various times. An example of the seasonal changes in
chemical composition as the plant matures can be seen in Table 7. Finally, determine change in oil yield and composition of most
promising species over a 24-hour period at optimum oil production time.
Before proceeding from stage 2 to stage 3, positive answers on another set of
questions are necessary:
- Can the plant be successfully reproduced?
- Is there a definite market potential for the oil?
- Does the crop exhibit an economic potential?
- What is the current market price of the oil?
- What is the current market supply situation?
- What are the market and usage trends for the oil?
- Would an extract of the plant material be a marketable commodity?
- Is there any value in the spent material?
- Is there any need for capital expenditure?
- Is the odor of the oil acceptable to the essential oil user?
- Does the trial quantity of oil meet physico-chemical specifications?
A considerable number of tasks require completion in order to adequately answer
these questions. Assuming a positive answer, then the cultivar of the selected
species can proceed to the next stage.
The following questions that need to be answered during this stage:
- What is the potential for mechanization?
- What are the best fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, and irrigation
practices?
- What is the best crop rotational scheme?
- What is the potential marketability of the oil?
- What is the economic potential?
The workload associated with this stage is to treat the cultivar of the
selected species as a small farm crop by performing all farming practices using
commercial mechanical equipment. At this stage in the life of the crop,
replicated experiments should be performed so that fertilizer, irrigation,
herbicide, and pesticide regimes can be established. At harvest time, the
plants should be distilled using commercial or pilot scale equipment rather
than laboratory equipment so that accurate yields per unit area can be
obtained. Once the oil has been produced (presumably in kilogram quantities),
then it should be circulated to user companies so that trade acceptability can
be assessed. Also during this stage, a more detailed report on the market of
the oil should be prepared. Finally, based on the costs associated with the
trial acreage, a detailed economic analysis of oil production should be
performed.
Assuming everything looks promising through this stage, before proceeding to
stage 4, the following questions must now be answered.
- Is there a market demand for the oil?
- Is the production of this essential oil profitable?
- Can the crop be successfully mechanized?
- What are the optimum fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, and irrigation
practices?
- With what cash crops will the crops rotate?
- What is the optimum distillation time?
- What is the potential marketability of the oil?
- What is the return on the investment for establishing this new essential oil
crop?
Once the cultivar of the selected species demonstrates potential as suggested
by this planning scheme, the next step is mini-commercialization.
By this stage two major questions need to be answered:
- Is this a commercially viable essential oil crop?
- What are the new problems that must be overcome?
The workload associated with this stage is often dependent upon the amount of
seed, or propagates that are available to plant. It is recommended that a
minimum of 2 ha (ca. 5 acres) be planted because an important factor to
determine at this stage are the fixed costs associated with producing oil from
the cultivar of the selected species at various hectarages (4, 20, 40, 400 ha).
With this information in hand, an accurate picture of the economic viability of
the crop can be obtained. With the yield information, it will be valuable to
determine the area that it would take to plant and produce 1, 5, or 10.0% of
the world market demands for this oil. This information will put the oil
production statistics in perspective and may point out some potential
vulnerability especially if the production facility becomes an essential oil
monoculture.
Before proceeding from stage 4 to stage 5, a final set of questions need to be
answered:
- Is there a market acceptance for this oil?
- Is the final profitability study favorable for the establishment of this
essential oil crop?
- What are the costs associated with various crop sizes and is there an optimum
crop size to maximize profit?
- How many hectares need to be devoted to the new crop to supply 1 to 10% of
the world essential oil needs?
Assuming that all of the previously encountered questions can be answered
favorably and the data collected was accurate, then the expansion to a
large-scale production is the final stage in the development plan.
Once a crop is in full-scale commercial production, the area grown will be
determined by the ease and ability to market the oil profitably. Although in
this stage of the plan, the crop will move from the research phase into the
maintenance and improvement stage, there are some tasks that should not be
overlooked. This includes increase in oil yield, decrease in cost of oil
production, increase processing efficiency to improve oil quality as the market
demands, and maximize the market and profit position.
Based on the world market supply and demand and industry trends, the oils that
could prove economically viable for production in North America include: sage,
marjoram, hyssop and Melissa (Lamiaceae), blue chamomile, davana and tarragon
(Asteraceae), lovage herb/root/seed, and parsley herb (Apiaceae).
- Anon. 1986. Essential oils and oleoresins: A study of selected producers and
major markets. Int. Trade Centre, UNCTAD/GATT, Geneva.
- Bernath, J. 1986. Production ecology of secondary plant products, p. 185-234.
In: L.E. Craker and J.E. Simon (eds.). Herbs, spices, and medicinal plants:
Recent advances in Botany, Horticulture and Pharmacology. Vol. 1. Oryx Press,
Phoenix, AZ.
- Lawrence, B.M. 1985. A review of the world production of essential oils
(1984). Perfum. Flav. 10:1-16.
- Lawrence, B.M. 1986. Essential oil production: A discussion of influencing
factors, p. 363-369. In: T.H. Parliament and R. Croteau (eds.). Biogeneration
of aromas. ACS Symposium Series 317 Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.
- Simon, J.E. 1990. Essential oils and culinary herbs, p. 472-483. In: J.
Janick and J.E. Simon (eds.). Advances in new crops. Timber Press, Portland,
OR.
Table 1. The world's 20 top essential oils.
Essential oil | Species | Volume (t) | Value ($x106) |
Orange | Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck | 26,000 | 58.5 |
Cornmint | Mentha arvensis L. f. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes | 4,300 | 34.4 |
Eucalyptus cineole-type | Eucalyptus globulus Labill., E. polybractea R.T. Baker and other Eucalyptus species | 3,728 | 29.8 |
Citronella | Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt and C. nardus (L.) Rendle | 2,830 | 10.8 |
Peppermint | Mentha xpiperita L. | 2,367 | 28.4 |
Lemon | Citrus limon (L.) N.L. Burm. | 2,158 | 21.6 |
Eucalyptus citronellal-type | Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. | 2,092 | 7.3 |
Clove leaf | Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. and L.M. Perry | 1,915 | 7.7 |
Cedarwood (US) | Juniperus virginiana L. and J. ashei Buchholz | 1,640 | 9.8 |
Litsea cubeba | Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. | 1,005 | 17.1 |
Sassafras (Brazil) | Ocotea pretiosa (Nees) Benth. | 1,000 | 4.0 |
Lime distilled (Brazil) | Citrus aurantifolia (Christm. & Panz.) Swingle | 973 | 7.3 |
Native spearmint | Mentha spicata L. | 851 | 17.0 |
Cedarwood (Chinese) | Chamaecyparis funebris (Endl.) Franco | 800 | 3.2 |
Lavandin | Lavandula intermedia Emeric ex Loisel | 768 | 6.1 |
Sassafras (Chinese) | Cinnamomum micranthum (Hayata) Hayata | 750 | 3.0 |
Camphor | Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl. | 725 | 3.6 |
Coriander | Coriandrum sativum L. | 710 | 49.7 |
Grapefruit | Citrus paradisi Macfady | 694 | 13.9 |
Patchouli | Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth. | 563 | 6.8 |
Table 2. Worldwide production of the major essential oils of the Lamiaceae.
Essential oil | Species | Volume | Value |
Major essential oils | (t) | ($x106) |
Cornmint | Mentha arvensis L. f. piperascens Malinv. ex Holmes | 4,300 | 34.4 |
Peppermint | Mentha xpiperita L. | 2,367 | 28.4 |
Native spearmint | Mentha spicata L. | 851 | 17.0 |
Lavandin | Lavandula intermedia Emeric ex Loisel | 768 | 6.1 |
Patchouli | Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth. | 563 | 6.8 |
Scotch spearmint | Mentha gracilis Sole | 530 | 10.6 |
Lavender | Lavandula angustifolia Mill. | 362 | 7.2 |
Rosemary | Rosmarinus officinalis L. | 295 | 3.5 |
Clary sage | Salvia sclarea L. | 70 | 5.6 |
Spike lavender | Lavandula latifolia Medik. | 64 | 1.0 |
Ocimum | Ocimum gratissimum L. gratissimum | 50 | 0.8 |
Basil | Ocimum basilicum L. | 43 | 2.8 |
Marjoram | Origanum majorana L. | 62 | 1.2 |
Sage | Salvia officinalis L. | 35 | 1.8 |
Thyme | Thymus zygis L. and T. vulgaris L. | 29 | 1.5 |
Minor essential oils | (kg) | ($x103) |
Wild thyme | Thymus pulegioides L. | 2,000 | 100 |
Monarda (geraniol type) | Monarda fistulosa var. menthaefolia (J. Graham) Fernald | 2,000 | 40 |
Hyssop | Hyssopus officinalis L. | 1,800 | 32 |
Perilla | Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton | 1,500 | 1800 |
Savory | Satureja montana L. | 1,500 | 90 |
Monarda (thymol type) | Monarda citriodora | 100 | 5 |
Ocimum canum | Ocimum canum Sims | 100 | 5 |
Catnip | Nepeta cataria L. | 100 | unknown |
Melissa | Melissa officinalis L. | 100 | 4 |
Ninde | Aeollanthus gamwelliae G. Taylor | <50 | unknown |
American pennyroyal | Hedeoma pulegioides (L.) Pers. | <50 | unknown |
Table 3. Worldwide production of essential oils of the Asteraceae.
Essential oil | Species | Volume | Value |
Major essential oils | (t) | ($x106) |
Armoise | Artemisia herba-alba Asso | 32 | 1.1 |
Tagetes | Tagetes minuta L. | 11.9 | 1.2 |
Tarragon | Artemisia dracunculus L. | 9.9 | 0.8 |
Roman chamomile | Anthemis nobilis L. | 6.0 | 3.6 |
Wormwood | Artemisia absinthum L. | 6.0 | 0.2 |
Blue chamomile | Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert | 4.3 | 2.2 |
Wild chamomile | Ormenis mixta Dumort. and O. multicaulis Braun-Blanq & Maire | 2.0 | <0.1 |
Muhuhu | Brachylaena hutchinsii Hutch. | 2.0 | <0.1 |
Artemisis martima | Artemisia maritima L. | 1.0 | <0.1 |
Davana | Artemisia pallens Wall. ex DC | 1.0 | 0.3 |
Minor essential oils | (kg) | ($x103) |
Yarrow | Achillea millefolium L. | 800 | 88 |
Artemisia afra | Artemisia afra Jacq. | 750 | 51 |
Artemisia annua | Artemisia annua L. | 600 | 16 |
Helichrysum | Helichrysum stoechas (L.) Monech and H. italicum (Roth) G. Don | 300 | 81 |
Santolina | Santolina chamaecyparissus L. | 300 | unknown |
Balsamite | Chrysanthemum balsamita L. | 100 | 3.5 |
Elecampane | Inula helenium L. | 100 | unknown |
Ereocephalus | Ereocephalus punctulatus DC | 50 | unknown |
Pteronia | Pteronia incana DC | 50 | unknown |
Artemisia vestita | Artemisia vestita Wallich | 50 | unknown |
Tansy | Tanacetum vulgare L. | <50 | unknown |
Table 4. Worldwide production of essential oils of the Apiaceae.
Essential oil | Species | Volume | Value |
Major essential oils | (t) | ($x106) |
Coriander | Coriandrum sativum L. | 710 | 49.5 |
Sweet fennel | Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. dulce | 255 | 7.7 |
Dill weed | Anethum graveolens L. | 114 | 0.8 |
Celery seed | Apium graveolens L. | 30 | 1.5 |
Caraway | Carum carvi L. | 29 | 1.0 |
Bitter fennel | Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. vulgare | 28 | 0.7 |
Anise | Pimpinella anisum L. | 26 | 0.7 |
Ajowan | Trachyspermum copticum (L.) Link | 25 | 0.3 |
Indian dill seed | Anethum sowa Roxb. ex Flem. | 25 | 0.1 |
European dill seed | Anethum graveolens | 23 | 0.2 |
Cumin | Cuminum cyminum L. | 15 | 0.9 |
Minor essential oils | (kg) | ($x103) |
Carrot seed | Daucus carota L. | 8,800 | 1230 |
Parsley seed | Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nym. ex A.W. Hill | 8,300 | 1162 |
Angelica root | Angelica archangelica | 4,400 | 3080 |
Parsley herb | Petroselinum crispum | 4,000 | 560 |
Asafoetida | Ferula assafoetida L. | 3,000 | 1035 |
Lovage root | Levisticum officinale L. | 2,000 | 1600 |
Lovage herb | Levisticum officinale L. | 1,500 | 712 |
Lovage seed | Levisticum officinale L. | 900 | unknown |
Angelica seed | Angelica archangelica | 800 | 880 |
Celery herb | Apium graveolens | 800 | 60 |
Ammoniac gum | Dorema ammoniacum D. Don | 200 | unknown |
Table 5. A crop dossier for caraway (Carum carvi L.).
Where cultivated: | Netherlands, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Australia |
Grows wild in: | Europe and W. Asia |
General plant information: | Biennial, Umbelliferae Temperate, seed and oil market |
Market size: | 3,600 to 4,500 kg oil (USA), 303 t seed (USA) |
Price: | $33 to 35/kg oil (USA), $1.00 to 1.06/kg seed (USA) |
Where used: | Mostly in flavors, also as a source of d-carvone |
Sensitivities: | Seed yield, oil content in seed, shatterability, photoperiodic affect on oil composition, water requirements |
Table 6. Essential oil yield ranges for various commercially important
species.
Species | Common name | Oil yield range (%) | No. samples |
Foeniculum vulgare | Sweet and bitter fennel | 1.3-9.8 | 50 |
Daucus carota | Carrot seed | 0.05-7.15 | 84 |
Coriandrum sativum | Coriander | 0.10-1.40 | 101 |
Ocimum basilicum | Basil | 0.01-0.30 | 102 |
Salvia officinalis | Sage | 0.04-0.17 | 19 |
Rosmarinus officinalis | Rosemary | 0.20-1.19 | 31 |
Hyssopus officinalis | Hyssop | 0.06-0.38 | 35 |
Tanacetum vulgare | Tansy | 0.02-0.29 | 12 |
Mentha pulegium | Pennyroyal | 0.10-0.38 | 12 |
Carum carvi | Caraway | 3.2-7.4 | 10 |
Table 7. Comparative chemical composition of Coriandrum sativum
L. at various stages of maturity.
| Stages of plant maturityz |
Compound | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Octanal | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.35 |
Nonanal | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Decanal | 30.0 | 18.09 | 11.91 | 6.30 | 6.24 | 1.61 |
Camphor | .08 | trace | 0.52 | 1.26 | 2.18 | 2.44 |
(E)-2-Decenal | 20.6 | 46.5 | 46.5 | 40.6 | 30.2 | 3.9 |
Dodecanal | 3.30 | 1.67 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.41 |
(E)-2-Undecenal | 2.56 | 2.17 | 1.39 | --- | --- | --- |
Tridecanal | 3.07 | 1.87 | 2.02 | 0.92 | 1.08 | 0.46 |
(E)-2-Dodecanal | 7.63 | 8.14 | 5.95 | 4.59 | 4.78 | 2.49 |
Tetradecanal | 0.68 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
(E)-2-Tridecenal | 0.49 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.13 |
(E)-2-Tetradecenal | 4.45 | 2.57 | 1.73 | 1.53 | 1.59 | 1.73 |
Linalool | 0.34 | 4.27 | 17.47 | 30.05 | 40.88 | 60.37 |
Geraniol | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.35 | 0.71 | 0.93 | 1.42 |
Geranyl acetate | 4.17 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
zStages of maturity: 1 = floral initiation; 2 = nearly full
flowering; 3 = full flowering, primary umbel young green fruit; 4 = past full
flowering 50% flower, 50% fruit; 5 = full green fruit; 6 = brown fruit on lower
umbels, green fruit on upper umbels; --- = not detected.
Last update May 7, 1997
aw