Seedless Watermelon Cultivar Trials for Southwestern Indiana, 2000

Mario R. Morales and James E. Simon

Department of Horticulture, Purdue University

West Lafayette, IN 47907

and

Angie Thompson, Melborn K. Lang and Dennis Nowaskie

Southwest Purdue Agricultural Research Center

SWPAC, Vincennes, Indiana 47951

Introduction: Seedless watermelons continue to generate both grower and consumer excitement, and in many urban markets around the US the percentage of seedless melons has gained considerably. Indiana remains a strong producer of seedless (triploid) watermelons, and since 1994, we have conducted extensive annual variety trials for seedless varieties. This trial, along with the seeded (diploid) watermelon variety trial provides an objective and independent comparative assessment of new watermelons for the commercial industry. This year’s study included 32 seedless watermelons, with two yellow fleshed types (Tri-X-Chiffon and ASR 4598819.

Methods: Seeds of 32 seedless watermelon cultivars were sown in the greenhouse on April 18 and transplanted on May 15 into a randomized complete block design with three replications. Stars-N-Stripes was used as pollinator and planted in every sixth row and in the guard rows. For commercial production however, we recommend that every third row serve as a pollinating row. Plots were single rows 55 ft. long, centered eight ft. apart, and covered with 4 ft. black plastic mulch. Each plot had 11 plants five feet apart. The recommendations in the Midwest Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers (ID-56, 2000) were followed for fertilization, weed, disease and insect control. Plots were harvested on August 2, 3, 14 and 21. The Purdue VARTEST computer program for variety testing was used in the analysis of the data. Trickle irrigation was used as necessary to provide ample water to the field plots.

Results and Conclusions:

Yields and Quality. Yields ranged from 27.6 to 37.7 tons/acre with 3003 to 4851 fruit/acre harvested across all the entries (Table 1), exceeding those of the seeded watermelon trial this year. Yields as expressed in tonnage and fruit number were higher this year than in the 1999 seedless watermelon trials, and this was also observed in the seeded trails. Average seedless fruit weight was 16.3 lbs/fruit, ranging from 13.7 to 18.5 lbs/fruit. The smaller weight per fruit led to the higher number of fruit in the seedless trial than in the seeded watermelon trial. Highest yielders included: ACX 7187, ACX 257, HMX 8915, Millionaire, EX 4203457, #5244, ACX 7167, SVR 4510759, Tri-X- Palomar, Peto 9356, Tri-X- Shadow and HMX8914. Most fruit were oval or round in shape and of medium size. #5244 was a higher yielder and exhibited high quality. Hollow heart was noted in ACX 257, ACX 2947, HXM 8915, EX 4203337, SVR 4590339, and ASR 4598819 (a yellow fleshed type). Above average varieties exhibited some degree of hollow heart also in this years’ adjacent seeded watermelon trails as well. While Millionaire has been available for several years and is a good seedless selection, other newer types that appeared promising in this year’s trial included: #5244, Palomar, Shadow, ACX 7167, Peto 1020, and RWM 8089. Of the two yellow fleshed types, Chiffon remains the top choice. Seedless watermelons should be a part of your melon production strategy as long as you have a market that will purchase the fruit at a higher price than the seeded watermelons.
 
 

Table 1. Comparison of Yield and Quality of Seedless Watermelon in Southwestern Indiana, 2000.
 

Cultivar

Seed Source

Yield Cwt. Lb/A

Yieldr Tons/A

 

Fruit No./A

Ave fruit weight Lbs

%SSs

Flavort

Uniformityu

Rindv

Sizew

Shapex

Fleshy

Degree of Seedlessnessz

ACX7187

AC

753.6

37.7

a

4521

16.8

10.8

3

1

M

M

Ov

P

2

ACX257

AC

753.2

37.7

a

4752

15.9

12.2

4

3

Th

M

Ov

P

3

HMX8915

HM

731.0

36.5

ab

4158

17.6

9.0

2

3

Th

M

Rd

R

2

Millionaire

HM

698.4

34.9

abc

4257

16.4

9.0

4

3

Th

L

Rd

P

2

EX4203457

AS

687.2

34.4

abcd

4455

15.5

11.2

3

3

M

S-M

Rd

P

2

#5244

AC

683.9

34.2

abcd

4125

16.5

11.0

5

2

Th

L

Ov

R

3

ACX7167

AC

679.8

34.0

abcd

3993

17.1

11.4

4

3

Th

M

Ov

DP

1

SVR4510759

AS

670.4

33.5

abcd

4224

15.9

10.8

2.5

3

Th

M-L

Ov

R

3

Tri-X Palomar

NV

665.0

33.3

abcde

4224

15.7

10.4

4

3

Th

M

Rd

DP

2

Peto9356

PS

661.3

33.1

abcde

4290

15.5

11.0

3

3

M

M

Ov

R

3

Tri-X Shadow

NV

658.8

33.0

abcdef

4125

16.0

10.0

4

3

M

M

Ov

 

3

HMX8914

HM

647.8

32.4

abcdefg

3861

16.8

11.4

3

 

M

M

Rd

P

3

ASR4598819

AS

647.0

32.3

bcdefg

3663

17.7

10.2

2

1

Th

M-L

Ob

Y

 

Tri-X 313

NV

646.1

32.3

bcdefg

4026

16.1

10.2

3

1

M

S-M

Rd-Ov

LP

1

ACX7177

AC

633.6

31.7

bcdefg

3795

16.7

10.8

2

2

Th

M

Ov

LR

3

Millenium

HM

629.1

31.4

bcdefg

3894

16.1

11.2

3

3

Th

M-L

Rd

R

3

Tri-X Carousel

NV

624.9

31.3

bcdefg

3927

16.0

9.8

4

2

M

M

Rd

DP

2

RWM8073

NV

620.4

31.0

cdefg

3729

16.6

10.8

2

3

M

M

Ov

DP

2

W5052

SS

620.2

31.0

cdefg

3399

18.2

10.6

4

1

Th

M

Ov-Ob

R

1

Peto1020

PS

619.7

31.0

cdefg

3993

15.6

11.6

4

3

M

M

Ob

R

3

EX4203587

AS

611.7

30.6

cdefg

3828

16.0

11.0

3

2

M

L

Ob

DR

2

EX4203337

AS

610.6

30.5

cdefg

3663

16.7

10.0

2

3

Th

M

Ov

R

3

SVR4590339

AS

610.5

30.5

cdefg

3465

17.6

10.6

2

3

Th

M-L

Ov

DP

2

SVR4590249

AS

606.1

30.3

cdefg

3861

15.7

11.0

3

3

Th

M

Rd

R

3

Tri-Xchiffon

NV

603.9

30.2

cdefg

4851

12.5

11.2

3

2

Th

S

Rd

Y

3

ACX2947

AC

603.4

30.2

cdefg

3597

16.8

11.0

3

2

Th

M-L

Ov

R

2

RWM8089-VP

NV

597.1

29.9

cdefg

4125

14.5

11.8

4

3

M-Th

M

Rd

RO

3

SVR4590299

AS

594.2

29.7

cdefg

3762

15.8

9.8

2

1

M

S-M

Rd-Ov

R

3

Freedom3022

SS

586.3

29.3

defg

3234

18.2

11.0

3

3

M

L

Ob

R

3

Revolution (4034)

SS

560.5

28.0

efg

3069

18.4

10.8

3

2

M

L

Ob

R

2

EX6279

AS

554.4

27.7

fg

4092

13.7

11.2

2

3

T

M

Rd

R

2

W5051

SS

552.9

27.6

g

3003

18.5

11.0

2

2

Th

L

Ob

DP

1

Grand mean

 

638.2

31.9

 

3936

16.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LSD (5%)

 

109.0

5.4

 

723

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.V. (%)

 

10.5

10.4

 

11

5.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Randomized complete block design: 3 replications.

r Yield wt. (tons) averages spanned by the same letter are not significantly different.

s %SS = Percent soluble solids: the higher the value, the greater the amount of total sugar.

t Flavor (1 to 5): 1=very poor, 3=acceptable, 5=great.

u Uniformity (1 to 3): 1=lacks uniformity/variable, 2=average, 3=very uniform.

v Rind: T=thin, M=medium, Th=thick.

w Size: S=small, M=medium, L=large, VL=very large.

x Shape: Rd=round, Ov=oval, Ob=oblong.

y Flesh: LR=light red, RO=red-orange, R=red, LP=light pink, P=pink, DP=dark pink, Y=yellow.

z Degree of Seedlessness (1 to 3): 1=brown of black seeds present, 2=white seeds present, 3=no seeds present.